New Delhi: Center filed its response in Supreme Court on Friday Waqf Amendment ActSaying that the law aligns with established practices and is a valid practice of Legislative power,
The government informed the Supreme Court that the petitions were based on a misconception that the amendments do fundamental violations. Religious freedom,
The Supreme Court had asked the central government to respond to the petitions within a week, while the petitioners allow them to present their joy within five days thereafter.
Here the Center told the Supreme Court in 10 digits:
- The Center said that the Waqf Amendment Act is a valid and valid practice of legislative power.
- The affidavit said that the constitutionalism applies to the laws made by the Parliament.
- The central government said that maximum two out of 22 members will be non-Muslim
Waqf Council And the Auqaf board, a remedy that is a representative of inclusion and the administration of Wakfs is not infiltrated. - The Center said in its affidavit that Parliament worked within its domain to ensure that the trust be maintained to ensure religious arrangements like Waqf.
- The affidavit further states that the blankets remain on several provisions of the Act without making them aware of adverse results, when validity was estimated there.
- In the affidavit, the Center told the apex court that arguments move on false grounds that remove the fundamental rights of religious freedom.
- The Center told the apex court that arguments move on false grounds that amendments remove the fundamental rights of religious freedom.
- The Center called the petitioners’ efforts to challenge the validity of the WAQF law against the basic principles of judicial review.
- The Center said that the provisions of encroaching private, government properties have been misused.
- The government said that the amendments to the Act were performed by a joint parliamentary panel after a broad, intensive, analytical study.
