Prince Harry Security Sue: ‘Single Out’: Prince Harry ‘inferior’ fights back in court on security treatment, the lawyer cited a threat from the Taliban

Prince Harry returned to the Royal Court of Justice in London on Tuesday to appeal to the 2020 decision of the UK government to downed his security details after stepping into a senior working royal.
Describing the move as “inappropriate” and dangerous, the Duke of Sussex argued that he was “sung for separate, inappropriate and inferior treatment.”
During the hearing, appearing in the person, a rareness in many of his legal controversies, Harry listened closely as his lawyer, martyr Fatima, underlined threats against his life and which he called a flawful security decision by a committee responsible for protecting the British Home Office and Royals and public figures.
According to court documents quoted by the news agency AFP, his legal team said, “Al-Qaeda recently called to kill (Harry),” and mentioned the 2023 incident in which Harry and Meghan were involved in chasing a dangerous car with paparai in New York City “.
Fatima argued that Ravak Committee The risks failed to properly assess and distracted from their processes. “The appellant does not accept that ‘BESPOKE’ means better. In fact, it means that he has been excluded for inappropriate and inferior treatment,” he told the judges, as quoted by the AP.
After his departure from Frontline Royal Duties, Prince Harry publicly lost police security after his departure in 2020. The British government has insisted that their security system will be handled on a “case by-case basis”, given their changed situation.
In 2023, a High Court verdict found that the government had done the legal job, but the appeal court later agreed to listen to Harry’s challenge.
In court, government lawyer James Eddie defended the verdict, stating that Harry’s logic was based on the “unfair, formal interpretation” of the review process and according to the news agency AP was the amount of failure to see the “overall of the picture”.
Rajkumar has claimed that the lack of security has made him unsafe to return to the UK regularly. In written presentations, his team said he and Meghan “felt forced to withdraw from royal duties” because “he believed that he was not protected by the institute”.
Harry has faced backlash in the past, including her 2023 memoirs. ExcessiveWhere he claimed to kill 25 people while serving in Afghanistan, a statement that raised a sharp criticism from the Taliban.
His presence in court also comes during a turbulent period in his personal and professional life.
According to the Reuters of the news agency, he is currently entangled in a boardroom row with Sophie Chandauka, president of Sentabale, a charity that he co-established in the memory of his late mother. Chandauka has accused him of bullying and racism, while Harry has condemned his comments as “clear lies” and described the fall as “heartbreaking”.
Parts of the hearing, headed by senior appeal judge Jeffri Vose, are being organized privately due to sensitive security concerns. A written decision is expected to be a later date.