The White House revised the Kovid -19 website to promote the ‘lab -leak’ theory, targeted foster and bidden

The White House on Friday launched a revised version of its Kovid -19 website, which was controversial Lab-leek theory At the center of its story on the origin of the epidemic. In the update, the former President Joe Biden and his top medical advisor are a sharp change in the tone, Dr. Anthony FausiTo suppress the debate on the origin of the virus and incorrectly connecting the epidemic responses.
The new page on Covid.gov, which previously served as a public resource for vaccines and testing, now announces a major image and a banner of President Donald Trump: “Lab Leak, true origin of Covid -19.”
The White House said in a statement, “This website has the actual origin of Covid-19 and how Democrats and Media have maligned alternative health treatments and lab-leakes theory.”
The site underlines five major arguments to support the lab-leek claim for China’s top Sars Research Lab, claims of insufficient bio-safety protocols, and claims that early infections arise from a single introduction in humans-use a controlled environment instead of humans.
“Sars-Cov-2 proximal origin of publication, which was repeatedly used by public health authorities and media to discredit the laboratory-leak theory, was promoted by Dr. Faussi to pursue the favorite story that Kovid-19 was born naturally,” the site accused the site.
It also accuses the biden-era of public health officials of sensoring dissatisfaction and engaging in “delay, confusion and non-reaction campaign”.
The step comes weeks after the CIA updated its evaluation, stating that now “more likely” the virus leaked from a Chinese laboratory -its earlier situation shows that there were insufficient evidence to determine the origin of Kovid -19. The FBI and the Department of Energy had previously expressed similar views, although the level of confidence varies.
China has repeatedly rejected the lab-leakes theory, called it “not very possibility”, and urged the United States to prevent the issue of original traditions from politicizing the issue.
The update site also criticizes early epidemic measures such as mask mandate and social remote measures, and is an animated map of Wuhan. A section called “Covid-19 misinterpretation” has accused the previous administration of conflict with social media platforms to suppress alternative views and only promote official guidance.
The Atlantic Council senior partner Jamie Metzal said: “I welcome all efforts to excavate deeply. But it would be a terrible shame if it would be a matter of terrible shame if to help prevent such efforts to prevent further infection and help people suffering from Covid -19 and long covids to treat people suffering from NPR.
The rollout of the site comes amidst efforts to restructured in US health agencies under the administration of Trump, with about 10,000 job cuts. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior, who is known for its vaccine doubt, has stated that shake-up is part of a broad push to prefer the prevention of chronic disease.
Covid-19 and related diseases have claimed over a million lives in the US, millions of affected worldwide.

The website lists five major points, suggesting that the origin of Covid-19 was not natural.

1. The virus has a biological feature that is not found in nature.
2. According to the data, all cases of Kovid -19 stem the same introduction in humans, which is contrary to the previous pandemics, where there were many spillover events.
3. Wuhan is the home of Sars Research Lab, China’s leading Sars, with a history of functioning function-off function research (gene change and living supercharging) without adequate biosaphy.
4. Researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) were ill with symptoms like Kovid in the fall of 2019, before the Kovid -19 was discovered in the wet market.
5. The website claims that if there were evidence supporting a natural origin for Kovid -19, it must have emerged by now. Lack of such evidence, according to the site, further strengthens the lab-leak theory.