Toi correspondent from Washington: When he said that India and Pakistan said what was really meant by US President Donald Trump Pahgam terrorist attackOne reading is that Trump is running on a neutral route, not wishing to take the sides in a clash contained in history, of which he is only a vague idea. Another interpretation: He is giving India an independent hand that it is necessary.
At the best time, the Maga supremo is not known for the clarity of thought or expression. Mangald Syntax, Jambal words and incomplete sentences are equal to the course. Nevertheless, on Friday, his comments about Indo-Pak position left analysts to scratch their heads, including the context of the fight on Kashmir and tension on the border “running for a thousand years or more … also included 1500 years.”
This is what Trump said that when asked about stress: “I am very close to India and I am very close to Pakistan, and they have a fight for a thousand years in Kashmir. Kashmir has been going on for a thousand years, perhaps longer (terrorist attack). The leader.
Charitable clarification from Trump supporters is that the US President was figuratively speaking to explain that Hindu-Bahul India and Muslim Pakistan have long been in Loggerheads, which have been seen through the lens of religion. They have to sort it among themselves and have very little that America can do.
Even an online group named United Hindu Council agreed with reading, seeing that Trump “was indicating a very deep history-and he is quite correct..the … Those who pointed out centuries-old religious mistake lines due to Islamist extremism-which has scared the history of Kashmir deeply and continued violence even today.”
But a more fine reading by some experts is that Trump is giving India an independent hand to “resolve” Pakistan, a reading that becomes strong, when someone “I will leave Bangladesh to the Prime Minister (Modi)” during the comment during the recent visit to Washington in February when he was asked about the change of governance. In the past, he has suggested that managing the situation of Pakistan is up to India.
Trump’s latest comment of “Free Hand to India” explained Christine Fair, a long -term South Asia analyst, whose extensive work includes deep insight into the use of Pakistan terrorist, which includes a means of state policy. He noted in a post on X, “It is the right message that even though there is an accident. Why should India be bail to Pakistan by trying to stop India? Pakistan should be taught a lesson … by India,” he noted in a post on X. ”
The President, even taking a Q from the State Department, which usually came out of the comments in the past, in which both sides were asked to exercise restraint, it has been quite silent. Remandable, State Secretary Marco Rubio posted a picture of a peace treaty by Washington between Congo and Rwanda on Friday, even Tram was telling about Russia and Ukraine.
“Big news coming out of Africa, where I am also involved in settling violent wars and conflicts,” Trump claimed about the Congo-Randa Treaty, “I don’t know why many of these incidents have fallen for me and my administration, but they have done an unprecedented job for me or my administration,”
Although Washington did not describe as “atomic flashpoints” in the past, any word about it has been gambling in Pakistan to invite American intervention for a long time. Also – “They will understand it in a way or another.”
