OP exposed pattern of OP vermilion failures, underperformance by Chinese weapon system: Report | Bharat News
Operation Sindoor not only marked a decisive military and strategic victory for India, but also highlighted significant weaknesses within Pakistan’s armed forces, especially from its heavy dependence on Chinese-supply military hardware. With about 82% of Pakistan’s defense imports arising from China, the conflict provided a real -world test for Chinese technology against a combination of Indian and Western platforms. During the operation, Indian forces successfully targeted and neutralized the major Pakistani military and terrorist infrastructure, often overcame or sideline the Indian missile strikes, including those distributed by the Brahmos missile, which led to the Chinese -Oro Air Defense Systems such as Headquarters -9. Reports suggest that other Chinese systems from PL-15 air-to-air missiles to J-10C fighter jets and naval frigates-weakened or malfunctioning, causing a compromise by Pakistani defense and unable to respond or effectively to respond to India’s aggressive.These operational failures were the results beyond the immediate battlefield. The inability of Chinese weapons to give in fighter conditions has damaged China’s reputation as a global weapon exporter, which has long strengthened concerns about the quality and reliability of its military equipment. Analysts noted that such failures first validate doubts about Chinese systems and China’s arms exports are likely to accelerate a decline, which were already shrinking due to quality issues. The reliability difference exposed by Operation Sindor provides a strategic opening for manufacturers of other weapons, including India, which can now emphasize its credibility and war-ride performance.
Major observation and events of failure
Air Defense Systems (HQ-9, HQ-16/LY-80)
- Many reports indicate the complete failure of Pakistan’s Chinese -made
Headquarters -9 air defense system Stop Indian aircraft or missiles effectively during conflict. - Indian forces successfully sidelined and blocked the Pakistani air defense systems, including important military establishments.
- The ineffectiveness of headquarters -9 and other Chinese air defense units has raised questions about their identity and reaction capabilities, especially against advanced Indian and Western systems.
- Chinese citizens allegedly criticized on social media, reflecting the failure of headquarters -9 for insufficient training and operational disabilities in the Pakistani side.
Air-to-air missiles (pl-15)
- Beyond the Chinese-made PL-15, a vizual-range air-to-air missile, which was postponed as a rival of western counterparts such as the US AIM-10D, failed to hit the allegedly desired goals or to malfunction the mid-flight.
- Indian military officials displayed a recovered pieces
PL -15 missile In Shikarpur, whatever had landed without killing, it further maligned the claims of its effectiveness. - While some initial reports of the Pro -Chinese media attempted to claim PL -15 successes, these claims lacked verification evidence and were considered to be a large -scale publicity.
CM-400akg Air-to-Surface Missile
- CM-400AKG is a Chinese air-to-Satah missile, often marketed as a “carrier killer”, designed for high speed, accurate strike against ground and Navy goals.
- It was quickly detected by Netra and AWACS. Despite its speed, it lacks secret features and has limited terminal mobility. Spoiled and susceptible to jam.
Fighter Jets (J-10C, JF-17)
- Despite deploying Chinese -made J -10C and JF -17 Block III fighter jets equipped with PL -15 missiles, they were not able to greatly impress or stop the Indian airstrike.
- Claims of Chinese propagation of Pakistani and J -10C aircraft shoot several Indian jets, including Rafales, remain unnatural and united by independent sources. No debris of Indian aircraft has been presented by Pakistan.
- The overall performance of these Chinese jets in the actual war against Indian aircraft (mixture of Russian and Western platforms) was considered ineffective by many analysts.
Radar system
- A strike by the Indian Air Force, allegedly destroyed a Chinese-supply YLC-8 Anti-ST Radar located on the Chunion Air Base in Central Punjab, and highlighted the weaknesses in Pakistan in China’s air defense offerings.
AR-1 directed missile (Posted via wing long-II drone)
- Overview: AR-1 is a Chinese laser-directed air-to-Satah missile, usually deployed with unmanned air vehicles such as wing long-II drones.
- Deployment in Pakistan: Pakistan used Wing Long-II drones, which is equipped with AR-1 missiles for accurate attacks.
- Performance during Operation Sindoor: Indian air defense systems successfully or neutralized the AR-1 missiles before reaching their goals.
- Analysis: The failure of the AR-1 missiles to enter Indian defense highlights the deficiencies in their effectiveness against the well-established air defense network.
Sugar-root drone
- Overview: Pakistan appointed various Chinese-origin drones for reconnaissance and aggressive operation during the conflict.
- Performance during Operation Sindoor: Indian forces stopped and neutralized several Chinese-origin drones along with debris displayed during official briefing.
- Analysis: The disability of these drones to avoid Indian aerial rescue increases their secrets and overall effectiveness in the airspace with competition.
Overall reliability and quality concerns
- Conflict has highlighted fundamental weaknesses in reliability and combat effectiveness
Chinese military technology Despite China’s aggressive push for the situation as a reliable option for western and Russian weapons suppliers. - Reports indicate that Chinese-supplied equipment often suffers from defective important components, poor quality control and inadequate after sales service.
- The previous examples of Chinese malformations and faulty military equipment sold by China for various countries (eg, Pakistan Navy) for faulty frigates for Navy, Nigeria and Myanmar) underlines a recurring problem with the quality of Chinese defense exports.
