New Delhi: United Nations Security Council closed door meeting on Rising India-Pakistan tension Pakistan failed to achieve any concrete results. Sources in the Indian government said that Pakistan’s efforts to internationalize this issue gave very little time as UNSC advised Islamabad to resolve and seek accountability for bilateral issues with India. Pahgam attackExpressing concern over Pakistan’s nuclear rhetoric and missile tests.In a 90-minute meeting, members-states have been learned to condemn the April 22 attack and were “tough questions” about the possible participation of the United Nations Pakistan-based terrorist group Lashkar-e-Tabiba.No one in UNSC is found for the false-flug story of Pakistan While consultation was expressed personally by some people, the council did not collectively make any statements. At least Pakistan will expect that there is an oral statement by the chairman of the council.Former Indian permanent representative of United Nations Syed Akbaruddin said that Pakistan’s discovery is to revive an agenda item that has not been formally done intentionally since 1965. Pakistan is currently a non-installed UNSC member.Pakistan was the Ambassador of India to the United Nations, when Pakistan demanded a shutdown consultation through China in 2019, when India’s ambassador said, “Lack of response to the council for Pakistan’s briefing was India’s Ambassador to the United Nations, when Pakistan demanded a bandh-door consultation through China in 2019.The 2019 meeting was also terminated without any result or formal statement, even if China had pushed it strongly. Closed door meetings include informal discussions that are held not in the council room but with a limited number of representatives in a adjacent chamber. For Pakistan, like 2019, the latest meeting was also more practice in management of public perception than to carry on any meaningful discussion, even though the consultation was held under the question of India-Pakistan which is related to Jammu and Kashmir and not under it, as it was initially, international peace and security ‘agenda’ threat to agenda items.In the meeting, according to sources talking on the condition of anonymity, members initially rejected the false flag story by Pakistan and asked about the possible participation of late in the attack. There were questions about targeting tourists on the basis of their religious identity. A source said, “The attack and recognition of accountability required was condemned. Some members especially brought the tourists’ goals based on their religious belief,” a source said, many members expressed concern that Pakistan’s missile tests and nuclear rhetoric were an increase factor.Prior to the meeting, some council members were reported to support the idea of an independent. International inquiry In the attack. According to the report of the Security Council, China and Greece have already indicated – before the meeting – their support for such investigation. Such an investigation, however, will require the consent of both India and Pakistan.Pakistan issued a statement after the meeting stating that the members of the council expressed “deep concern” and urged restraint at the risk of growth. It also claimed that several members also said that the J&K dispute remained the root cause of regional instability.
