Higher in hostility on India’s terms, BJP says, India rejects the claims of American pressure

New Delhi: BJP on Saturday dismissed claims that it was operated by stagnation in enmity between India and Pakistan. American pressureEmphasizing that the agreement was strongly on the terms of New Delhi. Contrary to the current understanding with previous examples, where India lost strategic benefits, the party credited the government for re -writing the story.Citing India’s new ‘War theory‘Any task of terror would be considered as the’ Act of War ‘against India, a BJP leader said that only the US and Israel had comparable principles, which mark India’s vocal global stance. This task also highlighted India’s leverage on India’s Waters Treaty, which is unaffected by the understanding of the present India-Pakistan border. In particular, the World Bank, once a guarantor, has removed itself from the treaty, strengthened the position of India.“India grows economic powerWhile Pakistan is a struggling state. Our focus is the welfare of 140 crore Indians, which is not wasting time on a delicate jihadi state, “BJP leader said. BJP is contrary to the current break in hostility with historical agreements, where India cited the advantage. 1949 The ceasefire, after the Karachi Agreement, based on the Karachi Agreement, after the US-BRCED talks and uncontrolled talks.The 1965 war ended with a twisting announcement of the Soviet Union and the United States, forcing India to return the hard-vone regions. The 1971 war, despite the surrender of Pakistan, led the Shimla Agreement under the influence of Moscow and Washington. India released 99,000 prisoners without gaining strategic benefits, such as Pakistan emptying PoK or formalizing borders.The Indian Peacekeeping Force (IPKF) operation in Sri Lanka (1987–1990) dried up resources and ended in return with the cost of former PM Rajiv Gandhi’s life. Similarly, the 1999 Kargil war ceasefire, smooth by the Clinton Administration, saw India to stop its aggressive, as if a strategic opportunity was missing in victory.The BJP said that the current stagnation in hostility reflected the terms of New Delhi, which prioritize national security and economic progress while maintaining strategic leverage. This approach, the party argued, ensured the increase in India’s global power, which is unaffected by previous concessions or external pressures.