Harvard: Harvard University opposes Trump’s demands, says it will not surrender to freedom for money

Harvard University Donald Trump took a bold step in opposing the demands of the administration, knowing that it would affect its money. In a detailed statement, the university said that the administration released an update and extended list of demands, warned that if we intend to “intend to maintain, Harvard should follow Harvard [our] Financial relations with the federal government. ,
Some of these demands aim to compete with antismitism, but to regulate “intellectual situations” in most Harvard, the university said.
“The administration’s recipe is beyond the power of the federal government. It violates the first amendment rights of Harvard and the government has more than the legal boundaries of the rights of the government under the title VI. Chase,” the university said.
In his letter to the administration, “Harvard is open to interact about what the university has done to improve the experience of each member of his community.

What did the Trump administration demand from Harvard?

A letter from Trump Administration states that by August 2025, Harvard should make meaningful governance reforms and restructured to make it possible to make it possible to make it possible to make it possible to: Promote the clear lines of rights and accountability, stated in the letter of Trump administration. Improvements include reducing the power organized by students and unexpected faculties, reducing more committed administrators for activism.
The university should adopt and implement the merit-based hiring policies, and should close all preferences on the basis of breed, color, religion, sex, or national origin during its work, promotion, compensation and related practices.
Faculty, employees and leadership, said this.
The university should immediately discontinue all diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, offices, committees, posts and initiatives, whatever name, and stops all DI-based policies, including DE-based disciplinary or speech control policies, whatever name; It shows that it has done so for the satisfaction of the federal government.