Option for Germany (AFD) has sued the Constitution (BFV) for the German Domestic Intelligence Agency, Federal Office, which recently confirmed the far-flung party “right-wing extremist.”On Thursday, BFV complied with AFD’s request to follow a so -called “Standstel Commitment”. This means that the agency is placing its official revival of AFD as a right -wing extremist party.AFD leaders Ellis Videll and Tino Krupalla celebrated the news as a success.Claim: “This is the first important step towards our enthusiasm and is to combat the allegation of right -wing extremism,” the party said on X. The post stated that BFV effectively withdraws the party’s classification as “the right -wing extremist”. ,DW Fact Czech: Fals.The classification “confirmation of the right -wing extremist” was not withdrawn.The AFD, which raised its seats in the last parliamentary election in February 152 (out of 630), applied to the court to issue an prohibitory order order if BFV to reject the “Standstil” order. Both devices are legal equipment that can be used by the plaintiff to ensure that an authority has to stop measures that the plaintiff considers illegal.“The Federal Office has now projected to issue such prohibition by issuing ‘Standstil’ order, which means that the federal office will avoid nominating AFD as ‘Right-Wing extremist’ party and it will not behave so until the proceedings are over.”Ogorak’s approach coincides with Michael Oat’s comments, the judge and the press spokesperson in the administrative court of Cologne: “The federal office considers its classification correct, it has only suspended the designation to suspend the designation to give time to a proper review,” he said.He said that it would give responsible judges time to work through a 1,000 -page report. If BFV refused to suspend its decision, the court could issue an prohibition. It would also have also frozen the previous decision to prevent the plaintiff from “potentially irreversible damage”, as Ogorak explained.Who is Ellis Waidel, co-leader of a distant AFD of Germany?According to the research department of the Bundestag of the Bundestag of the lower House of Germany, Germany, “confirmed rightist extremists” as the classification of AFD is mainly “internal classification” by officers. In individual cases, the decision BFV may be as a result of establishing a lower limit for intelligence monitoring methods as a “suspicious case”. This means recruitment of undercover agents or making secret videos and audio recording.However, legal requirements for such a strategy are met in both cases.‘This is everyday administrative procedural business’“The fact is that the legal representatives of the AFD or AFD are interpreting this ‘Standstone’ promise as if it was the first partial success in the proceedings, there should be strong contradiction,” said Ogorak. “This is everyday administrative procedural business, so to speak. It has nothing to do with success prospects.”BFV also issued such a vow during a case in 2021, when AFD filed a case against its classification as a “suspected case”. In that case, the court later issued a suspension order. The reason given by the court was that “every indication was that the office did not keep its promise to protect the Constitution or did not take enough care to ensure that no information relevant to the proceedings was leaked.,Earlier, the German media had reported widely on the proceedings. Then, in 2024, a Münster High Administrative Court ruled in the appeal proceedings that BFV was allowed to monitor AFD as a “suspicious case”.
