Did Deepika Padukone demand an inappropriate demand for the soul, or was she just asking what is fair? , Hindi film news
In an industry where whispering turns into headlines overnight, Deepika Padukone’s report has been reported for Sandeep Reddy Wanga’s upcoming film Bhavna, shook a lot of debate. 8-The fee of Rs 20 crore has been divided by Deepika’s terms, for the bell asking for the workday and allegedly refusing to speak Telugu for his role in front of Prabas, the words around Deepika have divided the opinion. Was she overreching, or was she just asking what is a major star of her stature? Even more important is that when a female superstar claims her price, why does it still give wings?
Demand in question
According to several reports revolving in business circles, Deepika Padukone placed some non-Nagans before coming to the board’s spirit. First, he requested the 8-hour workday, secondly, he allegedly asked for Rs 20 crore as remuneration-more than the film has been charged so far as well as a share in the profit of the film. Finally, he refused to give his dialogue in Telugu, allegedly citing unfamiliarity with the language.Naturally, the rumor mill had hurried to brand them as “inappropriate demands”, making anything speculation whether this could be the cost of his film. But retreat from resentment, and a fair perspective begins to emerge.
Working hours in bollywood
One of the primary glued points seems to request an 8-hour working request of Deepika. Nevertheless, ask the internal formula of any industry, and they will tell you that actors working in many changes are not a new concept. In the 90s, stars like Shah Rukh Khan, Salman Khan and Aamir Khan regularly flicked three shifts in a day, each shift goes up to 8 hours or more. Akshay Kumar, known for his discipline, famous in the morning shifts, wrapped by evening, and closing the weekend. And no one shines an eye. While shooting for Sultan, Salman was working and working for the film as part of his shift. So when Deepika asks for a similar setup, why is the commotion? Deepika recently became a mother and she was completing her duties as a mother with her career as a prominent woman in most films. To punish the schedule in a profession, lack of sleep, and notorious for round-round-round commitments, prefer health and productivity should not be controversial. In fact, one can argue that it sets a healthy example.
Language debate: to dub or not
Another bone of the controversy has been refused to speak Telugu in Deepika’s spirit, a film was mainly shot in language. Critics argue that this is an important requirement for authenticity. But here is a catch-in-India cinema, dubbing is not just common; This is an industry standard.For example, take Prabhas himself. In his Hindi release, this voice is actor Sharad Kelkar, who dubb for him – even in huge successes like Bahubali or Kalki 2898 AD or Sala: Part 1_ ceasefire. And no one then complained about lack of authenticity. Similarly, for Bollywood stars in Tamil, Telugu, or Malayalam projects, dubbing is a regular practice. So why single Deepika?Not every actor can master a new language. A poorly distributed line in an unfamiliar tongue can dilute the effect of a performance. The dubbing allows actors to focus on emotional by ensuring linguistic accuracy for regional audiences. This is a practical solution, not a copyout.
Knowing someone worthy of someone: Deepika’s salary on equality
Perhaps the heart of this debate lies in a long commitment to pay Deepika’s equality and fair compensation. This is not the first time she is erecting her ground on remuneration. About six years ago, she came away from a film famous when during the conversation, she was told that the fee of the male lead was to be adjusted, so that there was no place for her dialect.Deepika recalled the moment during a panel discussion on NDTV, he said, “I know that I know my track record, I know what I am doing – I know that her films (male actor) are not doing well as well. Thought I thought I was a part of a film, a creative contribution or brought only one value but was being underained.I was not well with him “.This is a feeling from Jennifer Lawrence to Priyanka Chopra Jonas by many prominent women in global entertainment. Compensation is not just about money; It is about respect, acknowledgment and equity.When male superstars, 100 million fees, profit shares, control over marketing schemes, or demanding input on final cuts, it is considered a smart business. Still when a female star interacts with the star, it is labeled as entitled. This is the prejudice that we have to face.
What is fair
At the end of the day, Deepika Padukone is one of the biggest names in Indian entertainment, with a proven track record of box office successes, significant praise and global appeal. Pathan, Padmavat, Chennai Express, Ye Javani Hai Deewani – List of blockbusters is long. If she believes that her contribution is entitled to a value, it is a conversation that she is well within her rights.What manufacturers agree is a different case. Interaction by nature, both sides include mutually discussed and reach out to discuss and reach. But to ask him – when countless male actors have created the same, if not the Heftar, demands over the years – only reflects dual standards with gender sex of the industry.
