‘Remove all IP laws’: AI legendary copyright heat in the form of Jack Daisi and Elon Musk

Two of the most influential figures of Silicon Valley, Jack daisi And Elon Musk, on Friday called all intellectual property (IP) to eliminate laws. Daisi posted “all IP laws” on X, to which Musk replied, “I agree.”
His remarks between the global backlash against AI companies came out of how they use copyright content.
AI companies claim that their models do not directly mimic the content, but learn the underlying patterns from the data. However, cases argue that these models often produce results that are attained by basic functions, increasing serious concerns about copyright violations.
Recently, Chattgpt’s studio ghibli filters, and later its creators are being criticized for free for some pain drawn by Japanese Animation Studios co-founder Hoyo Miazaki, who specified a few years ago that he does not want to reproduce his style digitally.
What is IP?
Intellectual property includes copyright, patent and trademarks. It is designed to protect creators and inventors from their work unauthorized use. But with generic AI, the lines are getting blurred.
AI Pushback
Openai and Google argue that innovation will slow down by limiting access to copyright data. His presentations in the White House’s AI policy scheme talk about falling behind countries like China, where the rules are less.
Sam Altman of Openai called it “Intelligence Age”, and claims that strict IP laws can obstruct America’s security and prosperity. Google echoed the scene, warning that strict models of Europe’s regulation should not become a global standard.
Legitimate reality
Lawsuits against major AI companies are increasing, one of the many high-profile complainants with the New York Times.
The courts are also taking a difficult stand. Recent ruling like Thomson-Writer case suggests that AI-related materials can still damage the market for original work.
A notable case in India involves a lawsuit where leading publishers such as Penguin Random House and Bloomsbury have filed a case to prevent chat from reaching their contents. India is also contesting a copyright case in India, arguing that the Indian courts lack jurisdiction as the company exits the US with foreign servers.