New Delhi: Vice President Jagdeep Dhikar On Thursday, criticized the recent decision of the Supreme Court, which set a time -line to decide the bills forwarded by the Governors by the President, weakened such a instruction Constitutional role Of the highest office of the country.
Talking to the Vice President’s Enclave from the sixth batch of Rajya Sabha, Dhankhar questioned, “We may not have a situation where you direct the President of India and on what basis?”
“Recently a decision has a instruction for the President. Where are we going? What is happening in the country? We have to be extremely sensitive. It is not a question of someone’s review or not.
Also Read: First, SC has set a 3 -month deadline for the President to decide on bills referred to by the Governors by the President.
He said that the Constitution gives the judiciary the power to interpret the law under Article 145 (3), but it does not authorize the courts to issue instructions to the President.
“Under the Constitution, under the Constitution, you have to explain the constitution under Article 145 (3) under the Constitution. It should be five judges or more there.”
His comments come in response to the April 8 verdict by the Supreme Court, which for the first time implemented a three -month time limit for the President to work on bills reserved by the state governors. The apex court said that any delay beyond this period should be justified, and urged the state governments to cooperate with the Center on such matters. The ruling followed a constitutional deadlock in Tamil Nadu, where Governor RN Ravi assured several bills for extended periods, motivated the state to seek judicial intervention.
Speaking on the alleged discovery of cash at Delhi’s High Court Judge Yashwant Verma House, Dhankhar said that the President and Governor enjoy constitutional immunity from the prosecution, a privilege has not been extended to other public data, including judges.
Dhankhar said it has been more than a month because the issue has come to light and “let the insects and skeletons remain in a public domain”.
“Now it’s more than a month, let the insects and skeletons be in the public domain. There is no impregnable cover against the independence, investigation or investigation of the judiciary,” said VP Jagdeep Dhikar.
In its judgment, the Supreme Court had separated the Governor of Tamil Nadu to the President in the second round of mentioning ten bills, calling it legally flawless. Justice clarified that if the President has accepted, the state government has the right to challenge the decision in the court.
