The Trump administration gave a grant of $ 2.2 billion to Harvard after defying its demands

The Trump administration on Monday announced that it would contract $ 2.2 billion and $ 60 million in the contract for Harvard after refusing to follow their policy demands related to changes in their policies.
The mandate issued under the direction of April 3 requires the change in the university’s rule, hiring and closing admission processes, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) offices and cooperation with federal immigration screening for international students.
The Joint Task Force suspended funding and grants to counter the anti-Jew-protests, which refer to concerns about the commitment of universities universities and responsible use of taxpayer funds. “Harvard’s statement today confirms the spatial disturbing mindset in our country’s most prestigious universities and colleges – that the federal investment does not come with the responsibility of maintaining laws of civil rights,” said this.
“In recent years, the dissolution of learning to affect the complexes is unacceptable. The harassment of Jewish students is unbearable. It is time for elite universities to take the problem seriously and be committed to meaningful changes if they want to get taxpayers support,” it is said in the statement.
What did the Trump administration want from Harvard?
In a letter to Harvard President Alan Garber on 11 April, US authorities accused Harvard of failing to maintain federal civil rights laws and educational standards, which justify continuing federal investment. This letter underlined a set of strict reforms, which the university should implement by August 2025 – in which governance restructuring, qualification – subjected recruitment and admission, destroying DEI initiative, destroying the approach diversity, and disciplining student malpractices – to maintain their financial relations with the federal government. “The United States has invested in the operation of Harvard University because due to the value of the country of discovery and educational excellence. But an investment is not an eligibility. It depends on maintaining the laws of Harvard’s federal civilian rights, and it is only understandable when Harvard promotes an environment that produces intellectual creativity and hardening, which promotes the rigor of scholars. Are anthethetic. ” Said this.
Adding the allegations, it said, “Harvard has failed to meet both the intellectual and civil rights situations that justify federal investment in recent years. But we appreciate the expression of your commitment to repair those failures and welcome the university to restore our cooperation in restoring their promises. So we present the provisions for the financial relations as the basis of Harvard, That will maintain an agreement with the federal government. “
Harvard’s response to demands
In his response, Harvard President Alan Garber announced that the university “would not negotiate its freedom or its constitutional rights.” Garber claimed that when the university is committed to addressing discrimination, it rejects the federal overache into academic autonomy. According to Harvard Gazette, Garber wrote in a message to the community, “The university will not surrender its freedom or abandon its constitutional rights.” He said, “No government – no matter what the party is in power – should decide what the private universities can teach, which they can accept and hire, and what areas of study and investigation they can chase,” he said.
Garber’s response came after the government issued a list of requirements before the government announced the funding freeze. These included detailed assessment of academic divisions and departments, evaluating perspective from students, faculties and employees, as well as proposed changes in Harvard’s administrative structure and recruitment processes.
Following the order, Professor Nicolas Bovi of Harvard Law School made a statement to CNN’s news Central, “Universities of the United States who are demanding universities are no less than ruling.” He said, “He is violating the first amendment rights of universities and faculty, demanding that the university wants to keep this money, they will have to suppress our speech and what we teach will change and how we study,” he said.
This action follows the increased tension on nationwide complexes, especially after Palestinian protests in response to Israeli military operations in Gaza. Some demonstrations led to a conflict with law enforcement and Israeli pro -counters.
Republican leaders, including President Donald Trump, have equaled some activist groups with Hamas-an American-named terrorist organization, whose attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 gave rise to the current struggle.
In March, the US Education Department launched an investigation in 60 educational institutions on reports of anti-Jewish incidents.
Despite revealing the operating surplus of £ 6.5 billion to £ 6.5 billion in revenue in the last financial year, Harvard firmly rejected that it should understand excessive and outside the federal authority. Garber reiterated that political intervention in educational decisions is unacceptable, regardless of party affiliation.
The New York Republican, known for its staunch support of Jews and Israel, has been a vocal critic of the leadership of Representative Elis Stephanik, Harvard. He praised the funding freeze, told Harvard about the decline of higher education.
Unlike Harvard, Columbia University chose to follow a similar White House mandate, seized $ 400 million in federal grant after the protests failed to protect the students adequately. Colombia has since implemented new disciplinary policies and increased safety measures.
Meanwhile, immigration officials have taken action against the columbia-based supporter-Filistini organizers. Mahmud Khalil is undergoing exile proceedings, and Mohsin Mahdvi was detained during his American citizenship interview.