New Delhi: Allahabad High Court A rape accused has been granted bail, as the complainant, after consuming alcohol with friends, agreed to go to his house and “invited trouble” himself.
The order passed by Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh said that being an MA student, the woman was enough to understand the morality and importance of her act. “
“It is the idea of the court that even if the victim’s charge is considered true, it can also be concluded that he himself invited the trouble and was also responsible for the same. A similar stand was taken in his statement by the victim. In his medical examination, the doctor did not give any opinion about sexual harassment,” said, “According to the news agency PTI.
“Keeping in mind the facts and circumstances of the case, and at the same time in mind the nature of the crime, evidence, complexity of the accused and the presentation of the lawyer, I am from the idea that the applicant has made a fit case for bail,” it is said.
Earlier, the accused presented that it was an “recruitment case” by the woman that she was an adult and resided in a PG hostel. She went to a restaurant with her friends, with her own wish, where she consumed alcohol. Because of this, she “got very intoxicated.”
The accused’s lawyer further argued that the woman and her friends stayed at the bar till 3 am. As he needed support, he decided to go to the man’s house for rest.
It is alleged that the accused instead took him to his relative’s flat and raped him twice and against the evidence on the record, the lawyer told the court.
It was also argued that given the facts of the case mentioned by the woman, it is not a case of rape, but it may be a case. Consent relationship between them.
On 26 March by the Supreme Court, it comes after the order of another controversial Allahabad High Court, stating that there was no “amount to attempt to rape a woman by catching the breasts and pulling the drawstring of her pajamas, saying that it is” total insensitivity “and” inhuman approach “.
Observes were made in the March 17 judgment by Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra.
