From ghibi-inspired images to Hollywood uproar: AI has to do copyright work of artists in the entertainment industry? , Hindi film news

As long as you are living under a rock, there is a possibility that you have filled your social media with dreams, hand-made pictures. From fans to Bollywood celebrities, everyone is jumping on the latest trend – transforming the moments of iconic film and individual pictures into studios inspired images GhibliSignature animation style.
What is really this trend?
It all started PuffyThe latest image-generation tool, which can immediately turn any photo into the construction of the ghibali-style with just the right prompt. Instagram, X, Facebook- You name it-‘Ghibli-Fied’ are full of snaps. While many people see it as a tribute to the mythological animation style of Hayo Miazaki, others believe it is crossing the line.
For long-term fans, these AI-made images are a way to honor Miazaki’s careful work that takes many years to make films, each frame drawn with immense care and accuracy. But Openai is now providing users the power to mimic their style in seconds, increasing number of sounds about creativity, morality and copyright.
The debate is especially hot as artists, musicians and filmmakers:
Singer and composer Vishal Dadlani called his words “AI Plasiyarization”. On Instagram, he wrote: “Sorry, I am not sharing any studio ghibali style images that you have created by me or for me. They also touched another pressure issue – the environmental impact of AI -“, not to mention, environmental terror that are those images. Please do not do anyone else. Thank you.”
Singer Armaan Malik echoed similar feelings. When a fan asked him during an AMA on X whether he had tried to adopted art, “I replied,” I felt that it was a lovely thing when it started, but I don’t like that the original Ghibali studio design language was being misused badly. I don’t like when the creators and artists are benefited. “
Hollywood’s new friend? On the big screen
While AI is taking the social media feed with a dream filter, it is also quietly making its way in the heart of Hollywood. Once seen as a villain in science fiction, now a studio has become the right hand. AI is being used to perform visual effects, voice manipulation and even fine-tuning actors.
In the 2025 Oscar, films such as Emilia Perez and Brutilist showcased AI’s growing role in filmmaking. Adrian Body won the Academy Award for Best Actor with the help of AI, which refined his Hungarian pronunciation in cruelists. Even the technology is helping D-Eg actors like Tom Hax and Harrison Ford for screen.
But when some hug AI as a film production revolution, others are pushing back
More than 400 Hollywood stars urged Donald Trump to protect the copyright work of artists
A few weeks ago, more than 400 Hollywood stars – Paul McCartney, Kate Blanchet, Mark Raffalo, Awa Dillo and Guillermo del Toro – indicated a letter indicating a letter that urged the US government to save the copyright from being erased by AI. According to the deadline, this letter came in response to the Trump administration to submit a proposal for the AI ​​action plan in response to Tech Tech veterans Openai and Google.
The letter warned, “The US global AI leadership should not come to the cost of our essential creative industries.” It said that the entertainment industry supports over 2.3 million jobs and brings more than $ 229 billion wages annually. Famous celebrities accused AI companies to reduce this economic and cultural strength by weakening of copyright security for films, television series, artifacts, writing, music and voices, which is used to train the AI ​​model at the core of the multi-dollar corporate valuation of the multiple dollar. “
Names such as Bette Mirdler, Paul Jiamati, Rosario Dawson, Ayo Edabiri, Dan Levi and Justin Betman also appeared in the list of signators, who are firm standing in their opposition.
According to the BBC, the real issue is not technology, but those who are making it. The AI ​​model is often trained using publicly available data, in which copyright works are shared online, sometimes without the knowledge or permission of the creators. Openai, Google and other technical giants are now facing many cases of writers, actors and news organizations, all claim that their work has been used without consent. Writers have also stepped from studios such as Paramount, Disney and Universal, but so far, no one has taken legal action. Meanwhile, the tech giants are asking the government to classify copyright content as ‘fair use’, so it can be used legally to train AI – that it is necessary to stay ahead in the global AI race, especially against countries like China.
Which jobs can AI take in the film industry? What did the chat answer here
Asked which roles can easily take or automate in the entertainment industry, Openai’s chatgpt provided a detailed list. Some of the weakest areas include basic script writing, such as formula-based stories, children’s shows, or low-bust thriller. AI can produce rapid drafts, although it still struggles with emotional depth. It can also help with storyboarding and concept art using devices such as midzoni or dully, helping directors to see the scenes quickly.
Background animation and CGI extra are also easy goals. The entire crowd can create a fantasy landscape, or city scenes without the need of teams of AI animators. Other areas include dubbing and voiceover, where AI can repeat voices in different languages ​​- or even bring back the sounds of late actors.
Subtitle, translation, and editing aids – such as choosing the best shots for a trailer or color grading – can be handled efficiently by AI. Even casting suggestions can be given using algorithms based on scripts and previous performances.
However, it is still difficult to change roles like direction, acting, cinematography and production design. While AI can support these jobs, a human’s creativity, emotion and artistic eye remain irreparable to now.
‘Nothing will be original’: Amar Kaushik seems to be an alarm
Filmmaker Amar Kaushik, known for ‘Stri’ and its hit sequel, shared his views in a chat with Komal Nahta. “Artificial intelligence cannot replace writers. This is the job of the mind … Your originality will not be there … Some or other people will catch you. Well, it is taken it from that film … so it will not be original. So there will be nothing original. And the human brain has the power to produce original.”
Miazaki’s warning: ‘insult to life’
Perhaps no voice on this subject has been as strong as Hayo Miazaki itself. Years ago, the master animator said that he found AI “completely disgusting” in animation and called it “insult to life”. He strongly stated that he would not “wish to include this technique [his] Work on everything. “Nevertheless today, AI-related material is everywhere in his style.
As the lines between tributes and theft continue to be blurred, this question is more wider than ever: Is AI paying tribute, or is it robbing artists of their life work?