The call for stagnation in the enmity of Indo-Pakistan was bilateral, no Trump’s role: Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri for Parliamentary Committee. Bharat News
New Delhi: Foreign Secretary Vikram MisriDuring a meeting of the Parliamentary Committee on Foreign Affairs, it was clearly stated that the call for a break in the enmity of Indo-Pakistan was taken after the DGMO-to-DGMO talks, Trump’s claims were about to broke up at the end of hostility on May 10-Why was allowed to make a topic for animated questions, to make a topic for animated questions.Misri has been learned, saying that Trump made his claims about “ceasefire” on social media, not through an official channel, where India could speak. At the same time, the top official underlined that Trump had revised by toning his statement on “mediation” for “help”. Mea also said that any other country has no Locus Standy to comment on J&K issues.Significantly, in the two-hour In-Camsra session, the Foreign Secretary saw the restoration of the general situation with Pakistan in the near future.Repeatedly asked, Misri informed the members of the panel that Pakistan’s DGMO Major General Kashif Abdullah made the first attempt to establish contact with his Indian counterpart on May 10 at 9.15 am. However, Indian DGMO Lieutenant General Rajiv Gai was in a handle with top officials until that time and could not call. Shortly thereafter, Pakistan’s High Commission officials reached the MEA to inform the Pakistani DGMO’s attempt to reach the GHEA, after which the two had a conversation at 1.15 am, a brief, first, at 1.15 am. The first round in which Pakistan DGMO expressed his desire to stop enmity, after which a formal conversation took place at 3.30 pm, which made the break.The timeline provided by the Foreign Secretary confirmed the report published earlier in this regard.The parliamentary panel is headed by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor and including Ravi Shankar Prasad, Asaduddin Owaisi, Sudhanshu Trivedi Abhishek Banerjee, Sagarika Ghosh, Rajiv Shukla, John Britis, Aparajita Sarani, Ed Singh, Deepdar Singh Houd. A record 24 members including the chairperson attended the meeting.Misri also told the panel that the conflict was completely in the traditional domain, and there was no nuclear signal from Pakistan, sources said – the contradiction of reports that Pakistan branded the nuclear threat during face to face, some claimed that the danger had inspired the US to intervene.To question Pakistan using Chinese weapons, Egypt said that India had curbed nine Pakistani airports, and the forums of the firm were used to launch weapons.The meeting saw a lot of questions about Turkey in support of Turkey, in which a senior member said that India had old relations with Turkey. But Misri replied that the Turks were traditionally not a supporter of India. He also denied that India was diplomatically isolated during the struggle.Meanwhile, Mea told MPs that Pakistan is making “baseless allegations” of India, which is sponsoring terrorism and committing additional judicial killings in Pakistan. “These allegations aim to attract a false equality between India and Pakistan, as both are victims of cross -border terrorism, which was not a case. Pakistan’s track record as a terrorist sanctuary is well established and lies in solid facts and evidence,” said this.Misri denied that Foreign Minister S Jaishankar had informed Pakistan about India’s attack, as his video comment. He said that the minister was mentioning only after the first phase of ‘Operation Sindoor’ when India had attacked terrorist bases in Pakistan.
