‘Must be united for a legal battle’: Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin writes to non-BJP states, alleging conspiracy against the SC Governor’s decision with the reference to the President. Bharat News

New Delhi: Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin on Sunday said the non-converted Janata Party that the states urged him to unite against the “trick” of the Center, when President Draupadi Murmu sought a reference before the Supreme Court about his decision in Tamil Nadu vs. Governor of Tamil Nadu.He accused the BJP -led Central Government of “advising the President to take a reference before the Supreme Court and called for” coordinated ” Legitimate strategy Before the court and the joint front to preserve and protect the original structure of the Constitution “.“As you know, the President of India, under the advice of the Central Government, has called for the jurisdiction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Indian constitution On May 13, 2025 and 14 questions were raised before the court. Although this reference does not specifically refer to any state or decision, it is intended to question the law and interpretation of the Constitution given by the Supreme Court in the Tamil Nadu state case. Governor of Tamil Nadu.While excluding the “horrific intentions” of the saffron party, Stalin wrote, “Obviously, the BJP is trying to harass the decision, which can be invited by other states as an example, when faced with an obedient governor. As the first organ of his ploy, the BJP government advised the President to a reference before the Supreme Court.”He said, “We should develop a coordinated legal strategy before the court and submit a United Front to preserve and protect the original structure of the Constitution, as our historic decision has retained by our Hon’ble Supreme Court. I am ready for your immediate and personal intervention in this important issue.”President Draupadi Murmu on Thursday presented 14 questions to SC about his decision, which sets a deadline for action by the President and the governors. In its judgment last month, the Apex court set a certain timeline for the governors to work on the bills passed by the state assemblies, emphasizing that under Article 200 of the Constitution, the governors are lacking as a discretionary power and should work on the advice of the Council of Ministers. The court further stated that the state governments can directly contact if the President approves the bill referred to by a governor. Emphasizing the constitutional boundaries, bench -JB Pardwala and R Mahadevan said that it is clear that the governors cannot reserve bills based on personal dissatisfaction, political objectives, or irrelevant factors, declare such tasks as unconstitutional and immediate innocent.