Watch: CBS anchor Tony Dokupil says that cardinals are raw on Papal Conclave, face Catholic Furry. world News
In a moment that has gone viral for all wrong reasons, CBS anchor Tony Dokpil shocked the audience with a slang-limen comment during a live segment covering the conclusion of the 2025 Pope. Discussing the isolation of cardinal-electricians inside the cystine chapel, Dokpil commented that the church leaders were “raw-dogs”, a comment that was ignited in a small amount of confusion, criticism, and any small amount of embarrassment on the other hand on social media.The term “raw-dogs”, although it has entered the popular slang with many informal uses, is widely known to engage in sexual activity without safety. The use of the word docpil in relation to the spiritual process of choosing the next head of the Roman Catholic Church left many audiences Surprised and other buses were amazed.
A pope process in tradition
To provide references, derived from the Conclave-Latin co-clav, which means “with a key”-the old process by which the college of cardinals selects the next pope. After the death of Pope Francis on April 21, 2025, 133 cardinal-electics were called to the Vatican to participate in the secret process. Rules are strict: no mobile phone, no internet access, no external communication. The goal is to encourage divine motivation rather than political intervention or external influence.This digital blackout was a topic of discussion on CBS Morning, in which veteran Vatican correspondent John Elon reported that the cardinals were completely cut off from the outside world. Dokoupil said, “They are raw-dogs raw-dogs-no phones, no lessons, nothing.” The co-stars Gayle King and Nat Berlson appeared stunned from moment to moment before continuing the section with nervous laughter.“This phrase and conclave do not go together”Backlash was immediate. Social media platforms erupted with the positions of the audience, who express everything from mistrust to resentment. Some commentators called it unfair, derogatory or tone-defense, especially the severity of the incident covered. “This phrase and the conclave do not go together,” wrote by a user on X (East Twitter). Posted another, “Just my Catholic grandmother had to convince what ‘raw-dogs’ meant.Thanks, CBS. ,The term, while occasionally used to describe anything without assistance or support in internet parlance (for example, “raw-dog reality” or “raw-dogs on Monday without coffee”), still carries a sexually assassinable meaning in most contexts. Its sudden appearance in a formal news section about a sacred religious ritual, for many people, was nervous.Some defenders of Dokupil suggested that the anchor was trying to use modern slang to appeal to small audiences or inject humor in long broadcasts. But critics reported that there is a time and place for Levity, and the possibility of centuries -old eccentric election process is not one of them.
A pattern of pointed moments?
This is not the first time Tony Dokpil has attracted the investigation for offbeat on-air behavior. In 2023, he was involved in a stressful interview with British actor Jason Isak over the Israeli-Gaza struggle. Earlier this year, he was criticized for a segment with former NFL coach Bill Belichic that many audiences felt unnecessarily combated.The CBS has not issued a formal apology or statement on the case. However, internal sources show that the network is “reviewing viewer feedback.” By Thursday morning, the clip continues to broadcast widely online, ranking millions of views in X, Tikok and YouTube, most users express different degrees of unreliability.
Weight of words in the era of virality
This phenomenon throws light on challenges that encounter traditional news outlets as they try to bridge generations and cultural intervals. The anchor today is expected to be both official and reliable, informative yet. The Kestrop Act often invites such moments where things can be spectacular wrong.One user commented, “This is when Legacy News tried to cossom the ticket,” a user commented. Another couple, “If you don’t call it in a church, maybe don’t say it during the coverage of the conclave.”The Vatican has not commented on the incident, nor is it likely. See Holy remains silent on western media accidents, especially when they come from outside Catholic circles. But among people familiar with Catholics and Pope elections, the response has brought from the inspiration to the crime.
Conclave continues
Meanwhile, the conclave itself is moving forward in strict adherence to the tradition. Cardinals around the world are in solitude inside the epostolic palace of the Vatican, who vote in privacy under Michael Angelo’s Fresco roof. When a new pope is chosen, the white smoke will rise from the cystine chapel chimney, indicating the world that the successor of Pope Francis has been chosen.Till then, journalists covering the event would do well to choose their words with care. While modern idioms may seem attractive or reliable in other contexts, applying them in one of the most sacred and time-educated processes in religious history is a misunderstanding that even the most experienced anchors can live to regret it.
