New Delhi: Citing previous incidents – Kargil War, 26/11 Attack and Kandahar Kidnapping – Where media coverage severely affected Safety operationOn Saturday, the Center issued a strong advice for media outlets, urging him to avoid live coverage. Defense operation And the movements of the contingent. Stress with increased stress Pahgam attackThe I & B advisor warned that real -time reporting “can inadvertently assist hostile elements” and danger National securityNews network
Advisor signal is a rapidly a matter of concern on the book, irregular flow of information
The central government said: “In the interest of national security, all media platforms, news agencies and social media users are advised to use the existing laws and rules strictly, using responsibility completely and reporting on matters related to defense and other security-related tasks.”
The government, especially on the basis of “sources-based ‘information related to” real-time coverage, proliferation of visuals, or defense operations or movement related to the movement, emphasizes that the disclosure can compromise the operational success before the time of sensitive details and put the personnel at risk.
Saturday’s advisory signs are a matter of concern on the sharp, irregular flows of information in the current media ecosystem – especially on digital and social media platforms, where battlefields and operational updates often occur on the surface before official confirmation.
According to senior officials, there are several legal provisions that regulate sensitive reporting already, including provisions under the Cable Television Network (Regulation) Act and Disaster Management Act and “Advisor subtle warns that violations can attract action”.
Security experts say that after images, videos and speculative reports, the step was unavoidable that flood news channels and social media after the Pahgam attack revealed the movement of some unknowingly reinforcement and anti-terrorism preparations.
Although the advisor prevents less ban on defense reporting, it underlines that media should balance public interest with operational sensitivity. “Extreme responsibility” is the key, the government said, in an environment where any careless spread can be armed by the opponent.
